Although my esteemed colleague Mr. Morlan understandably has a problem with “creepy old men staring down teenagers,” I, being sadly closer to the terms “creepy” and “old,” have no such compunction.
A lot of sports fans view the whole recruiting biz as pretty sleazy, perhaps especially now in the wake of the case of Kevin Hart, the HS senior from Reno who made up stories about being recruited by Cal and Oregon and even set up a press conference before suffering the humiliation of having to admit his deceit. And there is something off-putting about visiting fan sites and seeing crazed fans who seem more excited about recruiting victories in February than on-field wins in November. But the serious college football fan ignores signing day at his peril: plenty of evidence shows that, though a highly ranked recruiting class doesn’t guarantee success, it’s almost (almost!) guaranteed that your team can’t compete for the BCS title if it doesn’t bring in a consensus top-ten haul.
According to CSTV’s rankings (just picking one–of course there are dozens of rankers out there), these were the top ten recruiting classes of 2004 (players entering college in the fall of 2004, and probably juniors/seniors this past season):
1. USC 2. LSU 3. FSU 4. Miami 5. Michigan 6. Oklahoma 7. Georgia 8. UF 9. Ohio St. 10. (tie) Texas/Tennessee
Here is the final AP poll from the 2007-8 season (with the CSTV 2004 recruiting class ranking in parentheses if the team didn’t appear above):
1. LSU 2. Georgia 3. USC 4. Missouri (21) 5. Ohio St. 6. West Va. (47) 7. Kansas (51) 8. Oklahoma 9. Va. Tech (41–but note their 2005 class was #15) 10. Texas
This is highly unscientific, but it’s interesting (if not statistically significant) that six of the teams with top recruiting classes finished in the top ten four years later; Tennessee finished last season at 12 and UF at 13, meaning they were close as well. So the only two outliers from the 2004 recruiting rankings were FSU and Miami, two teams which have sort of flamed out the last couple years due to coaching stagnation and upheaval, respectively (among other things).
The four teams that made the top ten in 2007-8 without having top ten recruiting classes in 2004: Missouri, which had a good class in 2004 (#21) and rode a good qb and a great freshman wide receiver to some big wins; West Virginia and Virgina Tech, two schools which have (had in WVU’s case–sorry, Fred!) top-notch coaches and have become recent fixtures as football powers; and Kansas, a team which got hot and surprised people, which will always happen (and thank goodness–how boring would it get otherwise?).
Of course no one wins a national championship in February, but there’s a reason why some fixtures in the recruiting top ten in the 21st century (USC, OSU, Michigan, UF, Oklahoma, and LSU have all appeared in CSTV’s top ten recruiting classes at least four times thus far) are in the mix for the BCS title every year: they recruit well AND are well coached. Pretty common sense, and a good reason why creepy old guys like myself sweat out a bunch of 18-year-olds putting their signature on a piece of paper and faxing it to our alma maters.
As Fred suggested, there will be big-time flameouts like Xavier Lee, and some two-star guys will compete for the Heisman. But I’ll bet that four years from now USC, Florida, Miami, LSU, Clemson and Alabama (though I will hope intensely that Saban fails) will be fighting for BCS title game berths. But not Notre Dame: even with a consensus #2 recruiting class they’ll find a way to muck it up.