More Ruminations on the Great Conference Realignment
Some ideas related to the projected formation of the Big 64, a collection of four 16-team conferences:
1. There are lots of thoughts out there that the 64 chosen teams will break away from the NCAA, but keep in mind the various benefits the present arrangement provides. The most significant is by continuing to operate under the illusion that athletic departments are good faith portions of universities that are looking out for the good of the student-athletes, the universities and athletic departments enjoy certain public relations and tax benefits. Those benefits could be severely tested if certain people in the Justice Department got their way and/or the conferences and universities are too brazen in their greed. For an example of public relations at work, just look for all the mentions of the academic benefits of the conference realignments.
2. If there are four 16-team conferences, the Plus-One bowl option suddenly becomes more palatable. Assuming the champions of the Big 16 and Pac 16 meet in the Rose Bowl and the champions of the SEC and Big East/ACC (see #3) meet in either the Orange or Sugar Bowls, the winners of those events would advance to the closest thing to a non-mythical national championship. However, the new and improved Mountain West could have a protest vote if they are able to maintain their status as the next best football conference.
3. My first assumption is the merger of the Big East and ACC would keep the Big East name, but now I am not so sure the new conference would not throw out the ACC name. If the ACC is the naming option that prevails, the basketball schools could take the Big East name and the Atlantic 10 schools that would be raided could say they are headed to a more prestigious conference. Also, money is a bigger draw than aesthetics, so no administrator will blink an eye at Louisville and Cincinnati being in the ACC despite being 700+ miles from the ocean, no more so than the Texas schools headed to the Pac-10.
4. How would divisions work in the new regime? One aim of the divisions is to preserve local rivalries. The most likely football program is each team plays the seven teams in its division and two interdivision games that rotate.
- The easiest conference to decipher is the Pac-16. The eight schools in states on the Pacific Ocean would form the West division and the Arizona schools and Big 12 refugees would form the East division. Almost all significant rivalries are preserved; the Arizona schools have not developed any football rivalries of note in their 32 years in the Pac-10. The one rivalry not preserved, between Nebraska and Colorado, only developed in the 1980s and can continue out-of-conference. As the only conference schools without an in-conference rival, Colorado and Texas Tech would likely play each other the last weekend of the regular eason.
— Pac-16 West: Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, California, Stanford, USC, UCLA
— Pac-16 East: Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech
- The next easiest conference to work out is the Big 16. Iowa State and Iowa are a natural pairing. NU, MU, KU, and KSU can work out a satisfactory rivalry arrangement among the four of them. All major Big Ten rivalries from the eastern part of the footprint remain annual except for the Little Brown Jug.
— Big 16 West: Nebraska, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, Iowa State, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin
— Big 16 East: Illinois, Northwestern, Indiana, Purdue, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State
- The third easiest conference to figure is the Big East. The ridiculous Atlantic and Coastal appellations will be tossed in favor of easier South and North divisions. Boston College and South Florida could be swapped to improve geographic cohesiveness, but the Bulls are going to be an air flight away from the nearest conference member regardless, so it will not make too big a difference for them, unless #5 happens. None of the involved schools have rivalries, anyway.
— Big East North: Syracuse, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Rutgers, Connecticut, Boston College, Louisville, Cincinnati
— Big East South: Maryland, Virginia, Virginia Tech, North Carolina, North Carolina State, Duke, Wake Forest, South Florida
- The thorniest conference is the SEC, although even then much of the conference is a slam dunk. The SEC East is set to become an incredible beehive of hate. Would the proposal in #5 only exacerbate the hatred? Tennessee and Vanderbilt are moved to the SEC West because their rivalry is the most historically significant in the UT-Vandy-UK triad, and both Tennessee teams had their rivalries with schools from the west prior to the SEC expansion of 1992.
— SEC West: Arkansas, LSU, Mississippi State, Mississippi, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee, Vanderbilt
— SEC East: South Carolina, Clemson, Georgia, Georgia Tech, Florida, Florida State, Miami, Kentucky
5. There is a mutually beneficial swap that could improve geographic cohesiveness, although it would be historically damaging: The Big East sends South Florida to the SEC in exchange for Kentucky. Kentucky has not often been a factor in SEC football, while South Florida is more a football than basketball school. South Florida in the SEC also gives that conference a monopoly on Florida and the Big East a monopoly on Kentucky. Did I say something about historically damaging? Forget it; conference realignment is all about the money!
The conference that is the result of the Big 8’s acquisition of half of the Southwest Conference in 1996 has an identity crisis. It is kept hush-hush, but there is an issue of just what to call the dadgum thing. Actually, there is no such crisis. Notwithstanding the big ass Roman numerals in the logo, the official name is the Big 12. Big Twelve and Big XII are incorrect. However, I like big ass Roman numerals, so I will use small ass Roman numerals in my representation.